User talk:Torta de Limão

Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your edit to the Galaxy Burger page! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit. You should read the manual of style before editing.

I'm really happy to have you here!


 * -- Tigernose (Talk) 23:17, 9 October 2011

Hi i see you are doing a lot of edits lately! Would you see if you could try making some pages on my new " The Ratchet & Clank wiki " thanks!

90.216.80.16 22:30, October 17, 2011 (UTC)Tom

Images
Why thank you my friend. As a member of the wiki, my only wish is that every character gets a decent picture. The Size Matters zone is lacking LOTS of pictures. =)

Nice! I'm going to have some help! =D

One simple request, if I may: When you post a picture, please do post it as a PNG file. Other files are more likely to get corrupted or experience a quality decreasing over the years.

You're welcome my friend. Have a nice day ( or evening, depending on where you are ;) )

Sergeant Ratchet

Hi Mallo!

I apologise for my somewhat rushed attitude on my previous note. Today's been a very busy day, and I was tired when I wrote it.

The reason why I wanted the Ryllus image to be a 300px it's because most images of the wiki are that size nowadays. I must admit that it brings much life and color to the pages.

Also, I wanted to tell you that I changed the picture of Quodrona. The picture is exactly like the one you posted, expect that it is HD and a PNG file, which will grant the picture a long lasting quality. The size, as usual, will be left with a 300px size, but that shouldn't be a problem, considering that there is only one picture on that page, and thus, it won't look disorganised or out of place.

Nice to talk to you again, and keep up the good work.

Best Wishes

Sergeant Ratchet 22:44, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

PS: I liked the new picture you posted on Ryllus. The quality is great and it is a PNG file! =)

Thank you so much! =)

The year was great! Got to spend it with my family. ;) Can't say much about this year's Christmas, tough. =(

Sergeant Ratchet 23:10, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Not really. Things have been great, so I had no reason to be sad. And yet, this year's Christmas just felt a bit empty. I don't know.

Okay, bye. ;)

Sergeant Ratchet 23:24, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mallo,

I would just like to thank you for editing the "New Moon" page, I very much appreciate the help !!

Best Wishes, Henry

actually i talk portuguese, spanish and english :D

Tem que jogar comigo todos por um. coloque a sua ID na minha pagina para sermos amigos onlineLBPlombax7 08:11, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

bem, I GOT lbp 1 AND 2 AND (publicidade :D) I DID STARSHIP PHOENIX. veja depois!

sabia e estava a dizer que fiz a nave phoenix do R&C 3 no lbp. vai la ver

Dude its says exactly this quote by quote "Ride the winds in style with Megacorps new Momentum Glider"

The M in Momentum is capitilized therefore its part of the name and its not an adjective but a noun. also if it were to be called just Glider then why would they Capatilize the M. I strongly believe its called The Momentum Glider.

Ryno4ever 17:13, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

Here's the proof right off of my Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando game.

Bye :p

Ryno4ever 17:26, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

Dude its ok lol, i dont know why the word Momentum is not orange, but i do know that some of the other descriptions of items dont have the orange either.

Also your right some people you cant trust, but dude come on! i stated time and time again i have the guides, they help alot. lol Anyway I prooved that the item is called ''The Momentum Glider. ''

Bye :P

Ryno4ever 17:37, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

thats what im trying to figure out, because it could be something else or it could be a mistake a previous user made. There is no such thing as a gun turret in Going Commando the only possible exception is the megacorp secrity drone (not proper name) on dobbo but that is mentioned already.. its posible the gun turret was an acctual turret like those found on joba and snievlek were the player would get shot at by enemies.

bye

Ryno4ever 14:45, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

luiskoelho ;), esquecime de deixar rubrica :O

LBPlombax7 20:08, February 6, 2012 (UTC)

Independant Wiki
Hello again Malllo! Me and another user have been discussing about whether or not this wiki should be independant and not a part of Wikia, what do you think about this?DrNefarious 13:25, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

mudaste o estado da aphelion para desconhecido? Bom trabalho :) então ja me adicionaste online?

LBPlombax7 22:40, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Como vai mallo?

LBPlombax7 19:25, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

100%
Hey how are you nice trophies pictures did you beat all 4 one 100%? it took long but i got everything all the skill points trophies max level 10 all elite weapons for each character all the hero bolts and skins etc..

Ryno4ever 22:03, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Malllo
listen brother that guy is not talking about you, ive seen your work i cant speak portugeuse but your doing a pretty awsome job dont stop. As for the guy ill let him know that that type of language isnt allowed. You my friend have nothing to do with it, it has to do with a user on a different wiki, whose been stealing pictures saying its "free rights" and what not. anyways im sorry for any trouble i really like you your doing a great job. As for that message it was intended for somebody else i apologize. basically that user once warned me not to take pictures from another site and now that i warned him he treathens to remove me from wiki. well i wont stand for that because i can simply remove all my pictures and this wiki and his will be a mess. but i wont do that because im a huge fan. Hoever that guy needs to ask my premission before taking my pictures.

Ryno4ever 23:39, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Qwark's Throwing Weapon
Ryno4ever and I were discussing how we should find out the name of Qwark's Throwing Weapon in A4O, and we were wondering if you could perhaps ask them. Thats all for Now, DrNefarious 13:29, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks.DrNefarious 02:02, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Go right ahead

Ryno4ever 23:48, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

If the page exists, you can redirect it so you don't have to ask me to delete it. -- HiQu Talk to me! 12:53, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

You could've looked it up on google or this site's MoS section. Or just edited the page I redirected to see it. It's #REDIRECT  -- HiQu Talk to me! 15:11, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

 * Hello, my name is Haydos271. I've noticed that you have been an active member of this wiki, and you seem to follow the Manual of Style perfectly. You probably don't know, since I have been active since sometime last year, but I guess you could call me a "veteran" of this wiki. I am simply messaging you to get to know you a bit, as I can see you are a valued member to this wiki, because not many good editors are around anymore. I hope to be more active, and I just wanted to let you know that if you need any help with anything, I am available. So, anyway, I'm just letting you know that I exist, basically, so if you want to talk, feel free to. Hopefully we can keep this wiki in good order, defending it from the 10 year-olds who think they can edit. Cheers. XD -- Haydos271 Haydos271-Sig1.jpg  Chatterbox! 05:34, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Removing vandalism
Hello, thanks for removing the vandalism from Grelbin/Walkthrough ( http://ratchet.wikia.com/index.php?title=Grelbin%2FWalkthrough&action=historysubmit&diff=140160&oldid=140158 ). If you see a page like that in future could you please label it with so that it will be flagged up for administrators to delete as well.

Many thanks, Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 18:11, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good to be back. :) Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 19:28, June 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * And also for File:Bolt banker trophy.png. Thanks, Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 20:52, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * If you click on the links to the images I gave you and select edit. Then use the following template, picking the relevant information (I've listed some examples):

If you fill in the required fields and put that on the page it'll be fine. If you're still not sure look at some of the help pages I've linked in the earlier message, have a glance at an image such as File:Ratchet_Reepor.jpg which I've uploaded with correct info or feel free to ask again! Hope that helps. Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 21:27, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Re

 * OK. If it is non-canon then we might need add non canon templates to all of the SAC stuff. So potentially pretty big implications. Thanks for asking as we need this clarity. Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 16:30, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Qwark's throwing weapon
Has Insomniac got back to you yet?DrNefarious 02:10, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks.DrNefarious 02:21, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Thank you! :]
It was actually Jaade who nominated you, I then voted for you as I've been impressed by your edits with the amount and quality of the content you add to the wiki. So thanks for your edits! -- Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 20:43, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re:"Walktrought page"
Yes it's good. Follows the MoS very well, and is good quality. Thanks! If you're ever unsure just check against the MoS (walkthrough section), or use Reepor/Walkthrough (a featured article) as an example. Or ask me (or another user)! :) Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 20:40, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

Olá! Então ja me adiciounou ou viu a nave?

LBPlombax7 13:04, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Merge/Delete images
I think Lombax Clone should be merged with Ratchet Clone, but I've asked Tigernose for his input first. Also I've deleted four of those images. Thanks for letting me know. Kind regards, Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 21:50, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
You're very welcome! I believe you definitely deserve some recognition for what you've done! (Though both contenders definitely deserve recognition!)

Re:Read

 * Also thanks for bringing the page to my attention. It has now been deleted. Pages that need deletion can be marked with Template:Delete or you can just continue to let me know. Many thanks, Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 14:47, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Removing content
Hi. Could you please not remove content from your talk page. If you would like to remove it please instead archive it, by creating a page titled User talk:Malllo/archive_1 and then cut all of the content from your talk page and save it in the archive. You would then need to link to that page either at the top of this page or on your user page. I've left the deletion this time, just thought I'd let you know. Many thanks, Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 16:11, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Willy
I have searched the internet for the source, but it's not easy to find. The original article was in a printed magazine from OPM UK. I'll see if I can scour for it, but as far as I know, the original can't be found. Divine Paladin 04:11, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Spin-offs
Just to clarify where we currently stand. As we've been unable to find proof that the spin-off titles are non-canon we are treating them as canon until a source 100% confirms it is non-canon. In relation to this articles shouldn't refer to SAC etc as spin-offs, only the game articles themselves should/could mentioned they are a spin-off from the main series. Otherwise they are just another appearance/source. Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 14:37, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Re:"SCA(non canon, I guess :P)"
Thank you for your painstaking efforts to clarify this point. Tigernose has contacted IG again on our behalf to clarify if SAC counts as an in-universe fictional show (such as how the Secret Agent Clank series is canon but is a fictional character within the R&C universe), making it canon but not in the way we currently cover it or whether it is entirely non-canon and unrelated.

As soon as we get a response we will create a policy page explaining the changes to the wiki and how we will be changing the wiki. Then we'll create a user project devoted to updating the existing articles, per the new policy guidlines. If you would be interested in leading the project please let me know.

Kind regards,

-- Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 14:46, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to add to this message, until this happens (I'll link you in once it's finalized) I'd appreciate you not changing the current content to non-canon etc. Many thanks, Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 14:47, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * With a project like this it just would mean you are a key contributor to that particular task, mostly. -- Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 20:31, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Potential edit war - Ratchet
Regarding a dispute over the article Ratchet I would like to strongly suggest you discuss any issues here before making any further changes. Thank you, -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 17:50, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Ratchet
There's no proof that it is an invention.  Broc    msg     Blog   18:13, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

So? No evidence that the rest is are lies.  Broc    msg     Blog   21:07, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

No. Just no. Your reasoning for reverting is utterly ridiculous.  Broc    msg     Blog   23:24, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

No. Your entire argument has failed with that reply since you started using ad hominem and over-emotional attachment. There is nothing to point that the Sasha and Ratchet information is a fabrication. You're just talking nonsense now.  Broc    msg     Blog   07:36, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Being here since October 2011 doesn't mean anything. In the past, I've been editing Wikis since January 2010 and have had 18000 edits across Wikia. Due to your personality, I can obviously tell you are thirteen. To say "I know what I am doing because I've been here for just over six months" is arrogant and immature itself, and therefore your entire argument and credibility has now fell flat on it's face.  Broc    msg     Blog   07:40, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

o.

"also please remember to stay civil; don't consider this an argument" - Hunterj

Also, what I said about your edit was not insulting. It was right. Your opinion does not matter because it is obviously incorrect.

thefreedictionary.com - au-thor-i-tar-i-an - Adjective - Favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority at the expense of personal freedom. My actions are not equal to the definition. Why would anybody be compromising to something completely ridiculous?

No. Guessing an age is not arrogant, as you act like a thirteen year old with your way of arguing and personality.

Your absurd excuses for your edit clarify nothing. There is nothing to prove that the Sasha and Ratchet edit are false.

Don't entertain me by arguing with more ad hominems and emotional attachments. You're pretty much just talking crap now.  Broc    msg     Blog   12:39, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

No. Every argument you have posted contains over-emotional attachment and ad hominems. E.g. referring to me as an authoritarian. Just because one Vox Newspost has false claims, doesn't mean all others do. I also noticed you have a history of making bizarre edits, including changing the lists of games from chronological order to ridiculous changes. But this latest edit claim of yours just takes the cake.  Broc    msg     Blog   12:42, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

SAC Spinoff
Do you have a picture/copy of the email that IG sent you saying SAC is a spinoff? People on the IG forums don't seem to understand that it is, and I'd like to shut up this debate. Thanks! Divine Paladin 03:47, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks! I just actually asked them right before I checked my email (to see that you had replied so quickly). I also asked about a few other things I wished to have clarified, but that's irrelevant to what we're talking about. Good discovery on SAC, btw, I must say! Divine Paladin 04:57, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Qwark's throwing weapon
Hello again Malllo, sorry to bother you but I was just wondering if Insomniac has told you the name of Qwark's throwing weapon yet. Thanks, DrNefarious 10:23, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you.DrNefarious 13:24, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Your reply was yet again filled with ad-hominems and over-emotional attachment. Your reasoning for the revert is ridiculous. Several false claims do not mean any other claims are false. Note how you said "I think". That's proof that you are just adding what you personally think. E.g. speculation, guesswork. The way you think it is better does not make it right.

There is no point or sense whatsoever in your absurd edit.  Broc    msg     Blog   13:09, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

I think you'll find that the majority of users are beginning to disagree with your edit.  Broc    msg     Blog   13:18, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Ratchet
Hello, I am going to strongly suggest that from now onwards you only discuss the issues with the "Ratchet" article on the talk page at the section I created (Talk:Ratchet). That way other members of the community can easily comment and we can have a discussion that resolves the issue instead of an argument. If you have any further questions please let me know. Many thanks, -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 14:26, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll respond to that with the following, I'm leaving something similar on Broccoli.'s talk page:


 * Both of you provide some good quality edits to this wiki that are usually consistent to the layout guide, which is important and something I really appreciate. I don't want either of you to feel you cannot edit. Likewise I don't want this argument escalated. In fact I would like to ask it end immediately. I ask that you discuss potential changes to the "Ratchet" article on the talk page linked and do not otherwise communicate to each other where possible, at least for a while. When discussing with each other please do not mention anything personal - take care with your wording to ensure nothing indirect or direct is said; focus only on the issue being discussed. Stay civil and respect each others opinions - please remember to assume good faith ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith ), this will be difficult but is very important as the two of you are locked in an argument.


 * I will monitor the Ratchet talk page discussion to help us come to a conclusion. If for whatever reason you do not feel you can cope with this or stick to these guidelines I suggest you simply ignore the dispute and edit other pages for a while - while this is not ideal I will not think badly with you for doing this and it is better than having a full-blown personal argument which could result in users leaving the wiki.


 * If you have any more questions please speak to me, feel free to come on the IRC as well, I'm on periodically and almost always when I'm editing. Finally, please remember that an argument is simply a waste of time while a discussion is a step towards coming to the right decision. Many thanks, <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 23:11, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Featured user
Thank you for your contributions. You were nominated for featured user status in June and are now the featured user. Please add the following to your user page:

Congratulations. -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 23:40, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm on the IRC for a few minutes if you require any further explanation about the "Ratchet" dispute. Just so you are aware, don't feel obliged. -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 23:48, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * To access through your web browser go to http://webchat.freenode.net/ and type your user name into the user name box, #R&C into the channel box and click connect. (See R&C:IRC for further information if necessary). Any problems, let me know. -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 23:54, July 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * I've just commented on Talk:Ratchet now, at the bottom. I've suggested my solution. I advise you to leave your opinion below it and we'll see where we go from there. -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 18:40, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I realise that, what I meant was that it might be worthwhile commenting specifically on your opinion to my proposal. -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 18:48, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Broccoli.
Two users agreeing with you doesn't make you correct.

Ignorant: "Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular: "ignorant of astronomy".Also, I am in complete knowledge of the situation, therefore I cannot be ignorant.

Arrogant: Having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities. I have done none of this.

Don't say words if you don't know what they mean.  Broc    msg     Blog   18:39, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, the two users who agreed with me frequented here and were respected across the site. Also, I already knew the definitions, I simply searched for the definition to use them as a source. Talking like that isn't going to give you any credibility.  Broc    msg     Blog   18:52, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

I honestly cannot understand a single thing your sentence just said.  Broc    msg     Blog   19:11, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

You're going to leave just because you're arguing with a person who disagrees with you? That's pretty childish and isn't going to give you any credibility at all. It also hints that you think you're losing and can't accept it.

The rest of us are debating civilly and normally. If you're really going to leave over this, that's pretty pathetic itself and laughable.

My careful debate is stressful to you, and my factual argument is offending you? Get real. This isn't a petting zoo. You posted your opinions on the Internet. Aaaaand, if you post your opinions on the Internet, then you should expect them to be challenged.

Also, I don't know what I'm talking about? Do you even know what you're typing?  Broc    msg     Blog   19:38, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Again, you are wrong, as I am being civil. Uncivil; rude. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudeness     Broc     msg     Blog   19:45, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

No. They are not a few words. They are important and add a lot to the character's background. Saying that increases your ignorance. I am being civil. If you don't like my "attitude", then leave the Internet.

I am not rude, I simply state things to the point. Don't like it? Then leave the Internet.  Broc    msg     Blog   20:00, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Offensive: Causing someone to feel deeply hurt, upset: "offensive language". If you really are deeply hurt or upset by my to-the-point attitude, that's sad.  Broc    msg     Blog   20:01, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Then that's just sad. Also,

Successively; in order of sequence.

That doesn't make sense. Successfully would make sense.  Broc    msg     Blog   20:43, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

No. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/successive

Now, contribute to the debate instead of talking crap.  Broc    msg     Blog   20:55, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

In addition, just because they don't have red eyes, doesn't mean they are not YETI. The YETI in Secret Agent Clank have black eyes just like the UYA ones, but they are still classed as YETI. Also, Secret Agent Clank being a spin-off does not disprove this. Common-sense proves it.  Broc    msg     Blog   21:17, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

ShellShock
Your opinion is wrong. I do not have an opinion, I am stating facts. Obviously you haven't even played Team Fortress and have no idea what you're even saying.  Broc    msg     Blog   22:33, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

You implied you never played it, when you said "I saw the character on YouTube." If you played the game, you would instantly understand Heavy and wouldn't need the assistance of a video. You're just talking crap now. Lying isn't going to help you, it's just going to damage the reputation that you've mostly lost already.

I don't care if you have a different opinion, I have facts, yours is wrong. My claim is factual, unlike your frivolous claim. Unless you have played Team Fortress, your opinion is invalid and redundant.

Why don't you just leave like you said you were? You're nothing but a vandal trying to start drama and be a nuisance. Obviously you're thirteen. You're not giving yourself any credibility whatsoever.  Broc    msg     Blog   08:41, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

No, you obviously did lie, as you implied it, and now you are making up bull**** to save yourself from the hole you've dug yourself into. You are once again talking nonsense. You are completely incorrect and your opinion is uneducated, assumptive, and ridiculous.

To be honest, in my opinion, you nowhere near qualify for a Featured User.

Vandal: Somebody who damages public property. Your ridiculous dramas are equal to this. I cannot be a vandal, "offending" users is not vandalising, and we don't know if they are offended by the tiniest thing I said, which is nowhere near offensive.

Now, before writing another uneducated essay, why not reconsider your rant about leaving? We could do without your ridiculous claims and dramas here.  Broc    msg     Blog   21:50, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

You have not clarified anything in your absurd post. Why not reply with an intelligent counter-argument about Heavy, instead of screaming emotional messages about my attitude is offensive? Stop being soft. I'm not going to pat people, and you especially, on the head for the mere act of cobbling together words instead of fighting against bad logic and reasoning.

This isn't a petting zoo, If you're posting publicly, you're voicing an opinion. And if you're voicing an opinion, especially one as ridiculous as yours, you'd better be prepared to have it torn apart. It's the nature of public discourse. If you can't take the heat, rethink your position and reasoning methodology.

You have addressed none of my points about Heavy with anything beyond "i've watched a team fortress walkthrough i have 1500 edits i know what i'm talking about". If you actually bothered to use your Nature-given cubic centimeters between your ears, you would realise the strikingly similar personality and charisma of Heavy and ShellShock. But you cling on to the one bit of reputation you have and the hole you've dug yourself into.  Broc    msg     Blog   22:42, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Talking like that isn't going to give you any credibility. Dismissing me equals that you can't handle standard discourse and agree you have lost. Have fun thirteen-year-old.  Broc    msg     Blog   22:58, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted your childish edit on your talk page, as per the rule and policy, which I can link you to here: http://ratchet.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Neffy545?diff=prev&oldid=109829     Broc     msg     Blog   23:16, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

As per that post by Hunterj, you cannot remove content from your own talk page. However, you may clean it out or archive it if you like. Regards,     Broc     msg     Blog   23:19, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Did you notice the 4k character long reply that addresses your points above? And your reasons for why Heavy is not a reference are ridiculous. They are hardly reasons, merely a negation of everything I write, justified with the lie "i've watched a video walkthrough i know all about the game". A logical fallacy. Hence, not a reason. All you are doing now is childishly ignoring my factual reasoning, deleting posts, and reverting leaving no reason like a kid who can't handle his entire reasoning being torn to pieces. You are the exact reason I support the invention of a machine to send lethal shocks over the Internet.

If you want to keep your edit and add more to the discussion, don't spam. Your posts have degenerated into nothing but a series of ad-hominems, over-emotional attachments and NO U. If you want to counter my arguments, leave your lying and ignorance at the door and learn more about the Team Fortress.  Broc    msg     Blog   10:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Deleting talk page messages
You should not delete messages from your talk page just because you want it to be neat. Talk pages can be used a future reference - especially when archived - so please don't delete anything that hasn't broken any policies

What I do suggest you to do is to archive your talk page whenever it reaches 32,000 bytes. You can check the size of the page using "History". If you want to know how to archive talk pages, check how I did it on my talk page or on any other admin's.

-- <font face="Tahoma">Tigernose  •  <font face="Aharoni">Chat  •  <font face="Aharoni">Edits  20:44, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Olá!
Bem, em 1 é 'Luis' não 'Luiz' como disseste :P. Em 2, diz-me a sua ID para o adiccionar! Já agora veja a actualização do nivel da nave! Fiz o quarto do Ratchet :D!

LBPlombax7 21:35, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Parabéns!
E parabens por seres o Featured user do mes ! Muitos parabéns!

LBPlombax7 21:37, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Edit war
Hello, I have noticed the series of edit wars with Broccoli that have occurred. I therefore request that any edit of his you disagree with or contest, instead of reverting or editing it, you link the revision to an administrator. I'm working on a reversion/edit war policy that I'll put up to vote in a forum soon so we all know where we stand. If you have any further questions please let me know. Many thanks, -- <font face="Aurek-Besh Hand">Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 15:19, July 10, 2012 (UTC)