User talk:Nifky

Please leave new messages below.  // N i f k y ° 09:43, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks 'ye
I am also looking forward to work with you, and all the other users in the Ratchet & Clank Wiki. :)

Also, there's user called PacBoyCraZ, who posts obviously fake information to the Jak & Daxter related pages. Is there anything you can do?

-DNT 20:55, December 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * I would like for you to watch after this user above me, DoctorNefariousTrophy. He deletes information about Jak related topics and acuses me of adding "phony content" or whatever. Please watch him. 18:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, me and DoctorNefariousTrophy are friends now :). The Daxter skin is available in the multiplayer after defeating every level in "Iron Lombax". Clank is a playable character in Jak X, but Qwark is just an educated guess as I have played the game and have seen signs of him. You can protect the page, but I would like to add an image and infobox :). Happy Holdiays!

Trophy monitor
Would you like to become a trophy monitor. It would help if we have two instead of one...  HiQu Talk to me! 16:16, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Featured Articles
Hello there Just wanted to know about the Phoenix It has three votes to be considered a Featured Article, and well, it`s been a few time. Will it be featured or not? Thanks a lot Peter Kovich 16:41, December 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks!  HiQu Talk to me! 14:05, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Featured Articles
Oh, thanks a lot, and sorry for the misunderstanding. Merry Christmas! Peter Kovich 14:30, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello. Just a couple of quick things (as you're an administrator). Thanks for keeping the recent changes etc going while I've been mostly away, I've just been very busy and found it hard to find time to contribute (that is still the case, but I can now find a couple of hours a week I think). Please comment on the IRC meeting date/time as soon as possible so we can arrange the next meeting. The agenda is most likely our largest yet, however many of the topics just require confirmation so will not take long.

Something, which I have only just noticed, to look out for - the sourcing of long articles; I'll use A Crack in Time as my example. As it's a new article lots of editors have made many edits to the page as new information has been released (eventually the game), this makes it very difficult to watch due to the number of edits. During these many edits information was removed, and with it sources. However many of these sources are used multiple times, and as I am sure you are aware if the first one is removed the remaining uses of that source fail. This is just a quick note asking that, when watching the RC, could you please start checking for broken sources and informing users who are doing this how to correct the issue in the future - new users often need a hand with this, but again I don't need to tell you that! I wish I'd realised this was happening earlier so I could have watched for them more closely. I've lost several sources in A Crack in Time, and I'm not going to use several hundred revisions to find them again... Thanks for looking after that article in particular, as now I don't think it'll take too much work to turn into an FA at some point soon, it still has more than enough sources for FA standard, particularly now the game has been released. As you may know as of Friday the 1st of January the featured article will be changing biweekly instead of monthly, I have several FA's in the FA que, and hopefully more will be in the que soon so we can sustain this pace for the whole year.

Sorry for the long message, and thanks for your contributions this year. I hope you've had a Merry Christmas and will have a Happy New Year! -- Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 00:12, December 27, 2009 (UTC)