User talk:OfficialLolGuy

Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your edit to the Ratchet & Clank HD Collection page! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit. You should read the manual of style before editing.

I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!


 * -- Tigernose (Talk) 10:53, 4 March 2012

Malllo
Hello! You really gave that guy(184.160.246.15) a proper answer :D He insults people if they only write something wrong, or make a simple edit :/ If he didn't like the edit, it was a reason to him to insult others.

But thanks for your answer :)

bye

Malllo 14:17, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Source and license

 * That's fine, just please make sure you follow our policies with any uploaded files. Thanks, Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 19:27, June 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok. Please, at least add appearances, when creating a new article to ensure it's credible. Where possible add in sources or a comment on the talk page associated with the article stating where you found the info - this is particularly important for more obscure mentioned items. Thanks for your edits, -- Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 16:33, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw the sources for them in the see also. Thanks. Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 16:34, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch!
Hi there!

I just noticed your recent edits using the info I gathered from Insomniac's old website and I just wanted to give a thanks for the help of adding bits of the information to the articles :D I was gonna try and do it myself sometime, but I'm not very confident with my editing skills here (yet) and I'm always so busy with artwork on other websites that I dont come on here often.

But I'm glad to share the information here for others to make use of. So yeah, thanks again! And keep up the awesome work! LurkingLeanne 10:21, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

DreadZone cut content
Hi. Thanks for you recent contributions. I've noticed you added the cut contestants to the DreadZone page and thought I'd let you know that any cut content should be in a separate section lower down in the article. Many thanks, Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 23:02, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Potential edit war - Ratchet
Regarding a dispute over the article Ratchet I would like to strongly suggest you discuss any issues here before making any further changes. Thank you, -- Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 17:50, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Look, not all information of that Vox news update is canon. That information I removed could purely be an invention from the news reporters. I though it wasn't good to put this in the page because of that. Did you understand now?

Malllo 17:53, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Err... what? There is no proof whatsoever that it is a fabrication. Your reason is plain speculation.  Broc    msg     Blog   18:14, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

The news reporters Dallas and Juanita say some things that are obviusiously non-canon, like stating that Sasha is a Zygonian Robot Vampire, for example. Almost everything they say about Ratchet are lies.

Malllo 18:54, June 30, 2012 (UTC) As it is not known if the informations are true or lies it's better to leave the page as it was before, that means without the information you put in it.
 * They might be lies but they are still canon - i.e. it is canon that they lied. So not true biographic info, but true that the lies were said. -- Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 21:32, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Malllo 21:39, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Assuming they are all lies.-- Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 21:34, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

No. Just no.     Broc     msg     Blog   23:26, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Ridiculous? Honeslty the only ridicule guy here is you. You don't have the full rights to decide anything to be real. This is a wiki, a place that ANYONE can edit. You can't be authoritarian to people as you was with me in your last message. You are being such an autoritary and uncompromising person, moslty because you didn't even justify your "no". You simply said "no". This is a community and I am trying to solve this problem as well as the other lots of problems I had in this site, but it appears that you don't even justify why you don't agree with my edit. Calling my edit "ridiculous" is a funny thing to me, because I have been in this site since octuber 2011 and with 1,286 edits to be precisely, I very much know what I am doing.

I don't know if you read right but Hunterj said that info would not be biographic info. I reverted your edits because of this. As we don't know the information are true or lies, we have to let the page as it was before. It is logical.

Also, try to give me a true response, because your replies are of 1 or 2 lines and they don't pratically justify nothing.

Malllo 00:06, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

And now you have gone against Hunterj's request to be civil and not turn this into an argument by calling me an authoritarian and comparing me to Fascism.  Broc    msg     Blog   07:53, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Which Hunterj's request? He didn't say anything to me, nor in your talk page and nor in the Ratchet talk page. Man, you have insulted my edit and that was very bad of your part, actually. I am not being an arrogant, I'm just saying that I have a high edit count and I edit quite a lot, so I have learned too much things in here. As you have been in other wikis and your edit count is high, as you said, you should have learned a lot of things on that particular wlki too. But now, even if I was arrogant, you were really authoritarian and uncompromising in some of your replies, called my edit "ridiculous" and now you are saying that I am arrogant. It is like, it's only your opinion that counts and don't matter about the other users.

Guessing an user's age, by the way, is another arrogant treatment. However, I will leave some kind of a response for that: no, I'm not 13 and even if I was, what would be the problem? There are tons of different people in this world and I bet that not every 13 years old persons think in the same way. So, you said I was arrogant, but apparently you forgot to remember the attitude you took.

Oh, and again your response didn't clarify nothing for what the real subject of all this is about. It's not an "over-emotional attachment, and I have explained that to you. As mostly every vox news update that talks about Ratchet in some points are lies, it is assumed that this information could be a lie too, which in my opinion, it's far way more logical than putting information in an article without knowing if the source is a "true" one. Again, I'm saying that the page should be the way it was before you came and edited it. The reason for this I explained lots of time.

Malllo 12:26, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

You know, I am TIRED of all this. I try to be nice with people, but just to be honest, I am over inpatient with you now. I think you are the real immature guy here, because you don't get the real point of anything!

Most vox news update which talks about Ratchet are lies(have you played Ratchet: Deadlocked?). This is the real proof itself. They could just made up that to talk trash about Ratchet and his friends. That's all I think.

As you may noticed, yes, I had some conflicts here. And you know what? I never gave up for any of them. I am only another contributor to this site, and I would like to improve it the way I can, taking into account that this is a place that anyone can edit. I just edit the pages the way I feel it's better. This is a community and we all have to respect each other, and this does not inclue calling edits of people ridiculous, calling other people arrogant(without a justification and without even looking into yourself first) and etc. But one thing is right, I try to get my edits in the page, and it's not because of you that I will particullary give up. I experienced quite long things in here, and also for that, I know what I am doing. I don't know how you can consider experience, an arrogant attitude.

This has to be solved, but if you don't get the point of my edit, you make things a little difficult.

Malllo 13:04, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Look, sincerelly I had enough of this already. I will wait some admin come and think what it is his opinion. Because I guess they take the final say.

Malllo 13:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Jak X Skin
I don't know, pherhaps just to add more information for the Ratchet skin in the game. They could made up that. I think this should not be in the page.

201.51.36.191 13:11, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Ratchet
Hello, I am going to strongly suggest that from now onwards you only discuss the issues with the "Ratchet" article on the talk page at the section I created (Talk:Ratchet). That way other members of the community can easily comment and we can have a discussion that resolves the issue instead of an argument. If you have any further questions please let me know. Many thanks, -- Hunterj Hunterj's Resort 14:26, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * This is currently where I feel this argument with Malllo should stand:


 * Both of you provide some good quality edits to this wiki that are usually consistent to the layout guide, which is important and something I really appreciate. I don't want either of you to feel you cannot edit. Likewise I don't want this argument escalated. In fact I would like to ask it end immediately. I ask that you discuss potential changes to the "Ratchet" article on the talk page linked and do not otherwise communicate to each other where possible, at least for a while. When discussing with each other please do not mention anything personal - take care with your wording to ensure nothing indirect or direct is said; focus only on the issue being discussed. Stay civil and respect each others opinions - please remember to assume good faith ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith ), this will be difficult but is very important as the two of you are locked in an argument.


 * I will monitor the Ratchet talk page discussion to help us come to a conclusion. If for whatever reason you do not feel you can cope with this or stick to these guidelines I suggest you simply ignore the dispute and edit other pages for a while - while this is not ideal I will not think badly with you for doing this and it is better than having a full-blown personal argument which could result in users leaving the wiki.


 * If you have any more questions please speak to me, feel free to come on the IRC as well, I'm on periodically and almost always when I'm editing. Finally, please remember that an argument is simply a waste of time while a discussion is a step towards coming to the right decision. Many thanks, Hunterj [[File:Hunterj icon.png]] Hunterj's Resort 23:11, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Two users agreeing with you also don't make you correct :)

Man, you even looked up in a dictionary for the words... pathetic. Malllo 18:50, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and who said that I want credibility on this? Stop putting words in my mouth again. If the majority of people that frequent here don't agree with me, that's ok.

I only know that in a previous reply, you said to me that I was being arrogant just for saying that I am here for quite a long time and you also said that this doesn't mean nothing. If this doesn't mean nothing, why are you saying that it's some kind of advantage to the users and that, consequently, does mean something? You are just being the arrogant person you called me, and worse, you criticize me without even looking into your own previous attitudes. Also, everyone is respected here. It seems that you like to kind of overwhelm persons in here, first excluding the people which agreed with me and now with this. Malllo 19:07, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I'm tired of you, and because of you I'm thinking on stop my edits by here. Malllo 19:18, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

You don't know what I passed in here do you? I'm tired of arguing with annoying people like you and attitudes like yours make me stressed all day long. Getting stressed eveyday is not good for anyone. So, before you offend me again with your stupid words(and also say that you are being civil), think twice before doing in it, because you might know nothing of what you are talinkg about.

Malllo 19:29, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

One of the things that most bothers me is that you actually say that you are being "civil" and you keep offending me and my edits. It's not your arguments that are offending me, it is yourself. The attitudes you took with me and the way you put the words in the message is that offends me. I had problems with users a lot of times as you could see in my edits history, and any of them was like this one. Of course that they were people who offended me too, but not as much as you.

Another thing that I think it's quite stupid it's just because I removed a "versicle" of the page(which I believe it doesn't add nothing so special to the article), this entire discussion has been formed. All this just because of a "few" words. I mean, c'mon. Malllo 19:54, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

I know that in every place will have a person like you, with stupid and offensive attitudes, and that I and many other people have to endure this. But sometimes, it's difficult to handle when you are being successively offended by someone, and previously by other users as well.

I'm glad that you know the meaning of the word, because it's exactly how I fell.

Malllo 20:21, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

No, I didn't say anything wrong. I was offended successively, because you were not the only one who offended me. Since I begin editing here, lots of different users offended me. Did you understand now? What I said makes completly sense. Malllo 20:48, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

I saw the character on youtube. In my opinion, there is no similarity between then, except for the accent. You know that it's not only your opinion that counts right? Malllo 20:36, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Yes of course that I have idea. It's your opinion. You are stating facts that you think that are true. Don't you know that different people can have different opinions? Not everyone is obligated to agree with you. Just because it's your opinion doesn't mean that is correct.

Again, stop accusing things about people that you don't even know. How can you know that I haven't played the game? Just because I removed that?

And look, it's not because of you that I'll stop deleting things that, in my opinion, don't make such sense. I guess it's an admin that has to take care of this part. I mean, if people delete something that is not wrong, an admin will come and revert the edit. They revise most of the edits that people make, I guess.

Malllo 22:48, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

I didn't lie at any point. I just asked how could you know if I played the game if you don't even know me. I know I said that I saw the character on youtube, but that's not lying after all. Arguing with you is, honestly, a waste of time sometimes :/ Who said that my opinion is wrong? You just don't agree with me and that's it. It doesn't mean I am wrong. As I said, people can have different opinions and nobody is obligated to agree with you. You think that your opinion is a "fact", but I don't agree with that. So what? Are you going to keep offending me because of this?

I'm a vandal? Oh, could you explain to me how did I become the featured user then? I'm not doing anything wrong, we're just discussing. If you don't know how to do that, quit this thing. And sorry but the only one who could be considered a vandal here is you, because you keep offending me (and, actually, offended other 2 users in the Ratchet talk page) for no concrete reason. I didn't do anything to you(and neither them). The thing is that I have an opinion that is different from yours. If I've lost reputation, I don't care."Obviously" you must be only saying that because you don't agree with me. It's not because of a person that someone would lost "reputation".

I haven't played the game, but I watched many videos on Youtube(like walktrough ones) and I didn't see anything in common so much. Only the accent, as I've said. There is no need of playing the game to note such things.

Malllo 21:19, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Ah now you noticed?

Oh and I've heard of space bar for sure. Now stop with these stupid comments you make. Seriously, just stop. I see how cicil you are now...

Malllo 22:15, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

I won't be arguing with you anymore. Waste of time, as you may know. This is over, can't you see it? It appears you have some kind of likeness to overwhelm people a lot.

Attention: Any reply you leave in my talk page now, will be ignored and deleted.

Have fun speaking alone. Malllo 22:54, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

I know this might be weird, but what is wrong with 13 year olds, and how is calling someone that an insult?DrNefarious 02:56, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Featured user nomination

 * Greetings, Broccoli. I don't believe we've met yet, but I'm Haydos271, the newest administrator to the R&C wiki. I've been a member since 2008, and I have noticed the quality and effiency of your edits here, along with the fact you create articles based on small details given in games or on websites is a great help. Because of this, I feel you should be Featured User for August. All I need is your approval, and I will nominate you. Cheers. -- Haydos271 Haydos271-Sig2.png  Discussion 02:26, July 8, 2012 (UTC)